Your friend has a proof that P= NP. Here is their | Chegg.com
New Proof That P≠NP: Final Update - Almost Certainly not
WTF? Did he just prove P=NP while Ster was AFK? : r/jerma985
15-251 lecture 29, Complexity: P versus NP: A Theory of Efficient Algorithms Slide #38
1 Introduction to NP 2 Closure Properties for P
The Girl Who Proved P = NP
Attempt At P ≠ NP Proof Gets Torn Apart Online | TechCrunch
P ≠ NP, proof by AI : r/mathmemes
An elementary proof that P ≠ NP1
What Does 'P vs. NP' Mean for the Rest of Us? | MIT Technology Review
Introduction to NP- Completeness - ppt download
NP Hard and NP-Complete Classes
P and NP. Computational Complexity Recall from our sorting examples at the start of class that we could prove that any sort would have to do at least. - ppt download
P versus NP problem - Wikipedia
Proof that P=NP - YouTube
Undeniable $100% accurate P = NP proof : r/shittymath
P-versus-NP page
PDF) Proof that P ≠ NP
No proof of P=NP after all (yet?) – cartesian product … stuff about computing mostly
Matevž Gačnik's Weblog - P != NP Proof Failing
SOLVED: Your friend has a proof that P = NP. Here is their reasoning. It is known that the Knapsack problem is NP-Complete.Formally, KS =< I,C, k >|There's a valid subset of
Introduction to NP-Completeness - GeeksforGeeks
Explained: P vs. NP | MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology
IP (complexity) - Wikipedia
![PDF] A moment of perfect clarity II: consequences of sparse sets hard for NP with respect to weak reductions | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/a430162d1b2cf9759599534d0e1f54ba47da8658/3-Table1-1.png "PDF] A moment of perfect clarity II: consequences of sparse sets hard for NP with respect to weak reductions | Semantic Scholar")